Patrick Arnold: The Godfather of Prohormones Who Built Modern Bodybuilding Culture
TL;DR Patrick Arnold, the "godfather of prohormones," created or popularized andro, 1-AD, DMAA, and THG ("The Clear"). His BALCO designer…

Every few years the internet rediscovers something it thinks is shocking – and then it turns out to be kind of boring. The alleged leaked workout routine is no exception. But the real story isn’t what the exercises are. It’s what they reveal about training philosophy, aging, and realistic expectations.
No chains. No blood-flow restriction madness. No Bulgarian split squats taken to failure while quoting Marcus Aurelius. Just a short list of machines, two sets per exercise, three days a week.
“Is this really it? How did he stay lean? Bro, this is what my dad does at Planet Fitness.”
Before we get into whether the routine is real, the interesting part isn’t what the workout is – it’s what it tells you about training goals, age, recovery, and realistic expectations when someone isn’t trying to get huge. Just functional, reasonably lean, and not falling apart.
According to the leaked documents, the structure is painfully simple:
No squats. No deadlifts. No lunges. No fancy periodisation or progressive overload tracking. If this appeared as a paid PDF on Instagram, you’d roast it – and you’d be right, if growth were the goal. But here’s what people are missing.
I’ve coached men in their late 40s and 50s – guys with high-stress jobs, poor sleep, sometimes on TRT – who ran something almost identical to this. Two hard sets, machines over barbells, nothing taken to complete failure, in and out in 40 minutes. They didn’t grow. But they didn’t lose muscle either. That’s the entire point.
People love to dismiss leg extensions and lat pulldowns, but once your lower back has logged a few rough years, machine training stops looking so stupid. No axial loading. No balance demands. Predictable resistance curves. Easier to recover from.
This routine is a textbook example of joint management for aging athletes. No squats means no spinal compression. No deadlifts means no lower-back fatigue carryover. Leg press instead of squats translates to: “I still want functional legs but I don’t want chronic pain.”
“Two sets isn’t enough volume.”
Correct – if the goal is muscle growth. But for muscle maintenance? Two hard sets taken close to failure can absolutely preserve lean mass, especially when you built serious muscle in the past, you’re consuming adequate protein daily, and you’re not in a significant caloric deficit.
Research on minimum effective volume shows maintenance can require as little as one-third of the volume it originally took to build that muscle. Muscle is metabolically expensive tissue. The body resists giving it up if there’s still a regular signal saying “we use this.” Two quality sets sends that signal.
Three days per week, full-body each session. That’s deliberate, not lazy. Higher training frequency with low volume per session keeps motor patterns sharp, reduces DOMS, improves recovery between sessions, and fits into a demanding, unpredictable schedule.
This isn’t grind-culture lifting. This is “I have other priorities” lifting – and there’s nothing wrong with that. People dramatically underestimate how much consistency beats intensity once you’re past the initial muscle-building phase.
No intensity techniques. No forced reps. No drop sets. No training to absolute failure. That signals one thing: fatigue management took priority over maximum stimulus.
This is the kind of routine you can sustain while traveling frequently, under high psychological stress, running on insufficient sleep, and as you age into your 40s and 50s. It’s not flashy. But it’s sustainable, and sustainability is the single most underrated variable in long-term fitness.
I’ve had a 41-year-old client maintain an 85-87 kg lean bodyweight for two years on a similarly minimalist program. No new personal records. No ego. Just consistency. That’s the lane this type of routine lives in.
Everyone argued about volume landmarks and exercise selection. Almost no one asked the more important question:
What else was supporting this routine?
Because training is never the whole picture – especially at an advanced age or under significant stress. Nutrition, sleep quality, hormonal health, and pharmacological support all play enormous roles in body composition outcomes. Which brings us to the elephant in the room.
Claims circulating alongside the leaked Epstein files suggest his bloodwork was also released – and if accurate, it reportedly shows extremely low testosterone levels in his later years.
A note on reliability: Online leaks are unreliable, context is frequently missing, and people are quick to jump to conclusions. The analysis here is conditional on those figures being legitimate.
But if those hormone levels are legitimate, they completely reframe realistic training expectations, recovery capacity and session frequency tolerance, muscle retention without hormonal support, and overall body composition outcomes.
They open a much deeper discussion about hormonal aging, low testosterone in men over 50, and what “maintenance mode” actually looks like when endogenous testosterone is severely suppressed.
That’s a separate article – and a more important one. We’ll cover it properly next time.